Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 20th October 2023, 10:08 am
Drug trafficking charges at the federal level can lead to some of the harshest penalties in the U.S. criminal justice system. Federal sentencing guidelines provide a framework for judges to determine appropriate sentences based on the type and quantity of drugs involved, the defendant’s criminal history, and other factors.
Understanding how these guidelines work is critical for anyone facing federal drug trafficking charges. This article provides an overview of key aspects of federal sentencing for drug crimes to help make sense of these complex rules.
The United States Sentencing Commission issues guidelines that federal judges consult when sentencing defendants convicted of federal crimes. For drug offenses, the main guideline is §2D1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual.
This guideline provides a table that assigns a “base offense level” from 1 to 43 based on the type and quantity of drugs involved. The greater the quantity, the higher the base offense level. This initial level is then adjusted up or down based on other factors to arrive at a final offense level.
A defendant’s criminal history determines their “Criminal History Category” on a scale of I to VI. By plotting the final offense level against the criminal history category on the guidelines table, judges determine the sentencing range in months.
While judges have some discretion, in most cases they must sentence within the guideline range. Mandatory minimum sentences prescribed by federal law may also apply, which override the guidelines by requiring longer sentences for certain quantities.
Here are some of the most important factors that impact sentences under federal sentencing guidelines for drug crimes:
Not all drugs are treated equally. The guidelines provide the harshest punishments for drugs like heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine and fentanyl. Even small amounts of these drugs can trigger years in prison.
The minimum quantity to receive a mandatory minimum 5-year sentence is:
Trafficking larger quantities can lead to 10-year, 20-year, or even life sentences under the guidelines.
The sentencing range increases significantly for those with a more extensive criminal record. A Category I criminal history (little or no prior crimes) leads to a much lower range than Category VI (repeat offender).
Having prior drug felony convictions can also trigger mandatory minimum sentences that increase the guidelines range. For example, a 10-year mandatory minimum may apply if the defendant has a prior conviction for a serious drug or violent felony.
Those who played an organizing or leadership role in a drug trafficking organization face sentencing enhancements under the guidelines. Defendants who qualify as a “manager” or “supervisor” receive increases of 2 to 4 offense levels.
Being an “organizer or leader” leads to a 4-level increase. These enhancements significantly extend the sentencing range.
Defendants who “clearly demonstrate acceptance of responsibility” may receive decreases in their offense level under the guidelines. This often requires pleading guilty in a timely manner before trial.
While not guaranteed, this 2-3 level reduction can result in a slightly lower guideline range in some cases.
To understand how steep federal drug sentences can be, it helps to look at the guideline ranges for common drug types.
Even small amounts of heroin can lead to years in prison under the drug quantity table:
Possessing 1 kilo or more of heroin has a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years under federal law.
Cocaine sentences are linked to the quantity of cocaine mixture involved:
Possessing 5 kilos or more of cocaine mixture carries a 10-year mandatory minimum sentence.
Meth sentences are based on the quantity of pure meth involved:
Possessing 50 grams or more of pure meth triggers a 10-year mandatory minimum.
Beyond the sentencing guidelines, federal law contains provisions that often lead to even longer sentences for drug crimes.
Mandatory minimums require judges to impose often harsh sentences based on the drug quantity involved, regardless of the guidelines. They include:
Mandatory life sentences can even apply to certain three-time drug offenders under the “three strikes” provision.
Other federal laws increase sentences in certain situations:
Critics argue federal drug sentencing laws lead to excessive punishments that disproportionately impact minorities. Some key concerns include:
In response, reforms have aimed to reduce sentences for certain drug crimes. For example, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 reduced the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences. But fundamental problems remain under the current federal sentencing structure according to critics.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.