Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 17th October 2023, 10:57 pm
Being charged with burglary can be scary. As a lawyer, I wanna help people accused of burglary understand their options and build the strongest defense. This article explains the common defenses I use to fight burglary charges and get charges reduced or dismissed.
Burglary is illegally entering a building to commit a crime. To convict someone of burglary, the prosecution must prove:
If the prosecution can’t prove these elements beyond a reasonable doubt, the charges should fail. As a defense lawyer, I look for ways to create doubt around each part of the crime.
A key part of burglary is proving the defendant intended to commit a crime after entering the building. As a lawyer, I look for facts showing my client had no criminal intent.
For example, if my client accidentally entered the wrong home because they were drunk or confused, that could negate intent. Or if they entered to get warm or find a bathroom, not to steal. Without intent, there’s no burglary.
I also review the timing of events. If my client entered and left without doing anything criminal inside, that helps fight intent. Or if they entered legally but decided to commit a crime after. Timing matters.
Bottom line – I dig deep into my client’s actions and state of mind to show they never planned to commit a crime inside.
Another defense strategy is disputing whether the defendant actually “entered” the building. For example, if they only opened an unlocked door but didn’t go inside, that may not qualify as entry under the law.
I had a case where my client reached into a window to grab his keys off a table. We argued that briefly reaching inside isn’t the same as full-on “entry.” The charges got dismissed.
If my client had permission to enter, like an open house or party, that can also defeat the entry element. Overall, I analyze the specifics of how and when they entered to fight this part of burglary.
In some cases, I argue the entry itself was lawful, even if a crime got committed inside. For example, if my client was a contractor working in the building. Or had a key as an employee. Or even lived there with their partner.
Showing a legal right, reason or permission to enter the property fights the “unlawful entry” part of burglary. I gather evidence about why my client was there and their relationship to the location.
Being extremely drunk or high on drugs can be a defense to burglary in some cases. If my client was so wasted they didn’t know what they were doing, I can argue they lacked criminal intent.
This defense has risks though. The prosecution might argue it shows recklessness. But in the right cases, intoxication helps fight intent and unlawful entry.
Sometimes people enter places by mistake – the wrong house, wrong room, wrong building. If my client had an honest but mistaken belief they could legally enter, that can defeat criminal intent.
I had a client charged with entering his ex-girlfriend’s apartment to take his stuff. But he thought the lease was still in his name. That mistake of fact helped get charges dropped.
A solid alibi that puts my client somewhere else when the crime occurred can completely beat a burglary charge. I build timelines and get witness statements showing it wasn’t physically possible for them to enter the building.
Video surveillance, cell phone records, receipts and other evidence also help prove alibis. Alibis create that necessary reasonable doubt.
Sometimes I can’t beat the top burglary charge, but I can negotiate it down to lesser offenses like trespassing or disorderly conduct. This avoids the most serious penalties.
Lesser charges are still a win. Any reduction in what my client is facing is progress. I’ve had cases plead down from first-degree burglary to basic trespassing.
For defendants with little or no criminal history, I often seek special diversion programs as an alternative to prosecution. These involve classes, community service, counseling, etc. Once completed, the charges get dismissed.
Diversion keeps their record clean while teaching positive lessons. It’s a great option for first-time and low-level offenders.
When the evidence is weak, I file motions asking the judge to dismiss the charges. For example, if the entry was justified, incidental, or the intent unclear. I highlight every flaw in the prosecution’s case.
I’ve gotten many burglary cases tossed out when the facts just didn’t add up. Dismissal avoids a conviction and any penalties for my client.
If plea negotiations fail, we take the case to trial. I’ve defended burglary charges at jury trial by raising doubts about intent, entry, lack of permission – anything I can leverage.
At trial, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. If I can create some doubt in jurors’ minds, my client gets acquitted. Of course, trial is risky if we lose. But sometimes it’s our best option.
Fighting burglary charges takes an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Prosecutors almost always overcharge these cases initially. An attorney can get charges reduced or dismissed through negotiation or at trial.
Don’t go it alone against the government. Hire a lawyer to defend your rights, freedom and reputation.
If you or a loved one is charged with burglary, I’m here to help. Call me anytime to discuss your defense strategy in a free consultation.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.