Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 26th July 2023, 08:29 pm
Without a doubt, food is a quintessential necessity in life. Sadly, due to diverse circumstances, numerous individuals grapple with affording food for their families and themselves. To aid those in need, food stamp programs are available nationally and statewide, supporting approximately 25 million individuals annually. Nonetheless, instances of fraud exist and impact the integrity of these indispensable programs.
In the majority of cases, the food stamp program’s main objective is delivering essential nourishment. The most deplorable fraud transpires when vendors utilize food stamps as an unlawful currency. They acquire the stamps from patrons at a reduced rate and exchange them at an inflated value for commercial gain.
Vendors implicated in food stamp trafficking confront serious repercussions, including investigations by the USDA, FBI, and state law enforcement. Contingent on the fraud magnitude and subsequent utilization of funds, a retailer might face incarceration, hefty fines, an operating license revocation, and the rescission of food stamp reception privileges.
If one is under investigation for food stamp fraud, a range of defense strategies should be evaluated. A primary tactic entails disputing the fraud allegations. Occasionally, establishing fraud can be arduous as evidence may be confined to consumer testimonies.
A supplementary strategy involves asserting rights violations during the investigation. If appropriate protocols were not adhered to, law enforcement organizations may forfeit the right to procure evidence.
Given the grave consequences of retail food stamp fraud, acquiring legal defense support is crucial. An attorney with expertise in such cases can help devise a robust defense approach, negotiate with prosecutors, and improve the chances of charges being dropped or penalties diminished. Additionally, the legal counsel can offer guidance on future conformity with the pertinent laws.
Food stamps serve to help people feed their family members while simultaneously supporting businesses, particularly in low-income areas. Though recipients and businesses may perceive food stamps as a cash payment, the government strictly deems them for food purchases exclusively. Regulations must be followed by states and recipients alike, including reporting fluctuations in income or changes in household composition.
Businesses can end up in hot water by treating food stamp benefits like money and offering credit to recipients. This practice, commonly known as food stamp trafficking, is also classified as fraud.
Establishments convicted of trafficking are at risk of losing their right to accept food stamps. If long-term trafficking is unveiled, the business may be shut down until penalties are resolved. Asserting ignorance of such laws is customarily an ineffective ploy.
If accused of food stamp trafficking or fraud, seeking an attorney’s expertise is the optimal course of action. While businesses can offer IOU alternatives, using food stamp cards for credit is illegal and may result in a ban from the food stamp program or imprisonment.
Food Stamp Fraud springs from the struggle to meet daily necessities. Many Americans trade their SNAP benefits to obtain cash for significant expenses. Implemented to help financially challenged occupants, the SNAP program has seen a surge of dependents due to harsh economic times.
The USDA collaborated with convenience stores to support the distribution of SNAP benefits. However, trafficking instances involving retail outlet proprietors trading SNAP benefits for cash emerged. In the most extreme cases, SNAP benefits have been bartered for weapons and regulated substances.
Retail food stamp fraud or trafficking involving SNAP benefits can lead to rigorous penalties, encompassing significant fines, license revocation, or business dismantling.
The USDA and state governments enacted legislation to quash food stamp fraud. Retail stores suspected of food stamp trafficking are vigorously investigated by the USDA. In legal proceedings, the slightest indication of trafficking can result in severe consequences.
If a convenience store is found guilty of food stamp trafficking a second time, the business faces permanent closure or a minimum 12-year license suspension. Most stores opt to pay fines rather than encounter license suspension.
Disqualified establishments can re-apply upon completing the suspension period or after penalties are settled in full. The re-application process undergoes meticulous examination, with the Food Nutritional Service making the final verdict.
The FNS amasses data from the business, and the USDA forwards a charge letter to the store where evidence of trafficking has been identified. The retailer can decide between license suspension or paying fines for the fraud. A response to the FNS is required within ten days; otherwise, the decision is rendered without considering the retailer’s viewpoint.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.