Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Hey there! I wanted to write about Amendment 821, which makes some really important changes to federal sentencing guidelines. This stuff can be confusing, but it matters a lot – so I’ll try to break it down in simple terms.First off, what is Amendment 821? It’s a change made by the U.S. Sentencing Commission in 2023 to how criminal history points are calculated. There’s two big parts:
Before this amendment, you could get extra criminal history points just for being on probation, parole, or supervised release when your offense happened. They call those “status points.”The idea was to punish repeat offenders more harshly. But research found those extra points don’t really predict whether someone will re-offend. They just make sentences longer for no good reason.So Amendment 821 eliminates status points. This especially helps folks at the lower end of the criminal history spectrum avoid inflated sentences.For example, let’s say Joe got probation for a minor drug charge. A year later, while still on probation, he gets arrested again for another minor drug offense.Before Amendment 821, those “status points” for violating probation would shoot Joe up to a Criminal History Category III in the sentencing guidelines. That could easily double his recommended sentence, even though it’s his first real conviction.Now, without the status points, Joe would stay at Criminal History Category I. That keeps his sentence proportional to the offenses.This change prevents “double punishment” that wasn’t really justified. And it helps ensure the punishment fits the crime.
The amendment also creates a new 2-level reduction for defendants with zero criminal history points whose crime wasn’t violent or too serious.The goal is to distinguish true first-time offenders from career criminals. This prevents low-level drug crimes and non-violent offenses from being punished too harshly.For example, let’s say Mary got arrested for mailing her friend a package of marijuana. It’s her first offense, so she has zero criminal history points.Before Amendment 821, Mary could have faced 12-18 months in prison under the guidelines. But with the new 2-level reduction for first-timers, her range drops to 6-12 months.This change gives judges more discretion to assign sentences that fit the individual and their actions. It helps ensure punishments aren’t overly harsh for minor, victimless crimes.
Now here’s the big deal – Amendment 821 was made “retroactive.” This means it can reduce sentences already handed down, not just future cases.There’s a few great reasons to apply it retroactively:
Of course there’s also arguments against retroactivity. Some say it will burden the courts and hurt public safety. But most experts believe the benefits outweigh the risks.
Here’s the process inmates will go through to get a reduced sentence under the retroactive part of Amendment 821:
Again, it’s not a guarantee – but this change offers hope to thousands of families who want their loved ones home sooner.
So how does all this specifically impact drug sentencing? In two key ways:
Groups like Families Against Mandatory Minimums1 say Amendment 821 is a huge step toward fairness, proportionality, and restoring trust in the system for drug offenses.But even advocates agree there’s more work to be done. Let’s look at some of the key arguments around drug sentencing reform:
Oppose Drug Sentencing Reforms
There are good points on both sides. But study after study has found better outcomes when drug abuse is treated as a health issue rather than a criminal justice issue .Most Americans now support treatment-focused reforms. Amendment 821 seems like a smart step in that direction.
While Amendment 821 doesn’t fix every issue, it’s a big deal for reforming excessive sentences. This change offers hope to thousands of inmates and their families.I hope this (very long) article helps explain the impact of Amendment 821 on drug sentencing. Let me know if you have any other questions!Wishing the best to all those impacted. The wheels of justice turn slowly, but this policy shift feels like progress: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/sp/1003.pdf: https://www.centeronaddiction.org/addiction-research/reports/behind-bars-ii: https://www.aclu.org/other/cracks-system-20-years-unjust-federal-crack-cocaine-law: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743246/
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.