24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.





What Is the Burden of Proof in Federal Criminal Cases?

The Burden of Proof in Federal Criminal Cases

In any federal criminal case, it is the responsibility of the prosecutor to bear the burden of proof. The government must demonstrate that the defendant committed the crime. In a criminal case, guilt must be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt in a Federal Case

The Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment guarantees that no individual should be deprived of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The Supreme Court in the 1970s expanded the meaning of the Due Process Clause to include that a person’s guilt must be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

According to Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 374 (1970), the Supreme Court established that the government needs to prove every component of the crime to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. These burdens are the same whether the trial is held in state or federal court.

Proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is a fundamental standard of law in the United States. This is the highest standard of proof in the country. In federal court, an individual faces steep penalties, including losing civil liberties, assets, and personal freedoms. For that reason, the burden of proof standards must be beyond any doubt.

With that, the government must prove every individual element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. While the burden is steep for the federal prosecution, it is not impossible. The prosecution is not meant to dispel all doubt. The burden only states that “reasonable doubt” must be erased for a successful conviction.

Elements of a Federal Crime

There are several parts of a crime, and they are often known as elements. For a conviction, the federal prosecutor must prove these elements. In many cases, the crime must establish a defendant’s state of mind, often called the intent. Other elements also play a significant role in a case. For example, a federal drug trafficking charge has several elements, such as:

  • The defendant must have knowingly or intentionally had intent to commit the crime.
  • The defendant must have distributed, dispensed, or manufactured the drug.
  • The drug must be a controlled substance.

With that crime, the prosecutor needs to prove that there was an intent, an action, and an object used by the defendant.

Once again, the government has the burden of proof. Federal prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that those elements took place in the commission of the crime. With the drug trafficking example, prosecutors must prove that the drugs were a controlled substance. Along with that, the defendant must have intended to distribute or manufacture the substance, and there was the action of manufacturing, dispensing, or distributing the substances.

If federal prosecutors cannot prove any of these elements of the crime, then the defendant can be acquitted of the offense. These burdens are often hard to prove. With that, federal prosecutors work hard to establish a case against the defendant.

Federal Sentencing

If the federal prosecutor is successful, then the sentencing phase takes place. In a federal criminal trial, the sentencing occurs after the defendant’s guilt was established in the court.

In the sentencing phase, the defendant’s punishment or sentencing is determined. While the prosecution had a high burden of proof in the trial, that does not exist during this stage. Instead, the defendant’s sentence must be proved by the preponderance of the evidence. Federal processors need to establish that standard, which only requires that more than 50 percent of evidence points to a specific conclusion in the case.

Find a Criminal Defense Attorney

The federal government must prove a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. While that is a high standard, it is not impossible, especially for the federal government. They will use all their available resources to establish your guilt. For that reason, you will want to find a reputable attorney for your case.

With the right legal help, you can create a defense strategy that questions some parts of a federal case. If you have been charged with a federal crime, the burden of proof is the same as the state level. However, those penalties are often higher if you are convicted.

If you are being investigated or charged with a federal crime, you need to speak with an experienced federal defense lawyer!

Schedule Your Consultation Now