Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.
Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 23rd May 2023, 11:38 am
The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees all criminal defendants the right to effective legal representation. Sadly, many who are convicted of a crime believe they were found guilty due to inadequate defense. Proving that one didn’t get a fair trial because of their lawyer’s incompetence is a challenging task, but it is not impossible.
Reasonable Legal Standards: Simply losing a client’s case does not indicate that a lawyer provided inadequate representation. The most accurate measure of a lawyer’s performance is whether it is considered reasonable based on objective professional legal standards. Since there is no predetermined set of rules specifying what constitutes “reasonable,” each case of representation is unique. Defense lawyers will make critical decisions regarding legal strategy, and these judgment calls must be reasonable given the evidence and legal professional standards.
When someone receives a guilty verdict in their criminal case, the legal battle is far from over. In many cases, it’s just the beginning. This is the time to review all options for future legal actions. Appeals become a viable choice for many who hope to lower their sentence or overturn their conviction. Although appeals may be time-consuming and difficult to win, everyone has the right to appeal their verdict. A knowledgeable and experienced appellate attorney can review the case and establish the best course of action, which could involve proving that the initial trial attorney’s representation was ineffective.
In most situations, judges assume that attorneys know the best course of action in defending their clients. However, certain circumstances can prove a defendant had ineffective representation, such as:
– An attorney advising a green card holder to plead guilty to a reduced charge without explaining potential immigration consequences, leading to the client’s deportation when other legal options were available.
– An attorney failing to raise objections when the prosecution introduces evidence obtained through an illegal search, as they did not conduct proper pretrial discovery to learn about the evidence and its source.
– An attorney neglecting to hire an expert witness to counter the testimony of the prosecution’s expert witness.
– An attorney behaving unprofessionally during the trial, wearing inappropriate clothing, arriving late to court, or misinforming their clients about their case.
To establish a case of ineffective representation, individuals must prove that their attorney’s mistakes were so significant that they resulted in an unfair trial and consequently deprived them of a proper outcome. Moreover, it must be shown that an attorney’s negligence affected the trial’s outcome directly. Both of these elements must be proven to establish ineffective representation.
Motions for ineffective representation are subject to specific time limitations known as statutes of limitations. The timeline varies depending on the state where the court action took place. Typically, the statute of limitations is within two years after a defendant’s sentence and judgment become final. There are, however, some exceptions:
– The defendant hired an attorney to file the motion within the acceptable time period, but the attorney failed to do so.
– The facts needed for filing a claim were unknown to the defendant or their attorney within the filing time period, and it was not reasonable for them to have discovered them.
– The fundamental constitutional right being asserted was not established during the filing time period, but the right was established later and retroactively applied.
When you’ve been found guilty due to ineffective representation, it’s crucial to exercise your right to appeal. Hiring an experienced criminal appeals attorney can make all the difference in securing a favorable outcome. The legal world is complicated, with various obstacles in place that make success a challenge. The Spodek Law Group is well-versed in handling post-conviction appeals and understands the necessary steps to achieve desired results.
Don’t let a miscarriage of justice define your life. With expert guidance and a compelling strategy, you can fight for fair representation and overturn the consequences of an unfair trial.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.