Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 28th July 2023, 07:21 pm
Having your home or business raided by DEA agents armed with a search warrant can be a traumatic, high-stakes event. But submitting to unjustified invasions of privacy is never necessary. Experienced legal help allows asserting your Fourth Amendment protections against excessive searches effectively. Take steps now to protect yourself.
While DEA search warrants require affidavits showing probable cause of illegal drug activity, claims often rely on:
Information from criminal informants hoping for leniency is a frequent basis for search warrants, but tips may be fabricated to better informant prospects.
Suspicious Financial Activity
Large cash transactions, deposits, or wire transfers may raise questions about potential drug proceeds, justifying broad access to financial records.
Association With Known Dealers
Mere acquaintances or communications with suspected traffickers is often enough to trigger intrusive searches of property.
Tips from Other Agencies
The DEA commonly acts on vague information supplied by other law enforcement entities without scrutinizing reliability.
Previous drug convictions may subject you to warrantless compliance searches as a parolee regardless of any proof of current illegal acts.
Before acquiescing to any search demands, speak with counsel experienced challenging DEA tactics through litigation when warrants fail legal standards. Look for lawyers with:
Motion to Suppress Experience
Proven expertise filing suppression motions alleging Fourth Amendment violations is essential to exclude illegally obtained evidence.
Warrant Litigation Success
A track record of convincing judges to rule search warrants lacked probable cause or exceeded scope through zealous motions or evidentiary hearings reflects potent advocacy abilities.
Ex-Prosecutors on Staff
Insider perspective on DEA search warrant procedures from former federal prosecutors helps preempt and combat the agency’s methods.
Rigorous Case Analysis
Meticulous scrutiny of warrant affidavits for defects and investigative gaps distinguishes the most successful suppression litigators. Leave no stone unturned.
Drawing firm lines against breaches of constitutional freedoms requires talented counsel. Never submit to unjustified intrusion without a fight.
If DEA agents confront you with a search warrant, you need skilled lawyers who refuse to let authorities run roughshod over privacy rights. Led by renowned litigator Thomas A. Mesereau Jr., Mesereau Law Group provides tenacious representation challenging questionable warrants nationwide.
Mr. Mesereau is among the most respected trial attorneys in America, bringing immense determination to protecting client rights. His team leaves no argument unmade to invalidate flawed warrants through exhaustive evidentiary scrutiny and persuasive motions practice. If you face a DEA raid, they have the expertise and track record to suppress illegally seized evidence and statements. Contact them for urgent assistance.
Understanding what transpires before, during, and after DEA searches allows engaging knowledgeable legal counsel at the optimal times. While approaches vary, standard practice is:
Affidavits alleging probable cause of drug crimes are presented to a magistrate judge for approval. Defense lawyers may scrutinize both documents later.
If approved, DEA agents soon arrive to conduct an invasive search for drugs, documents, electronics, financial records, or other relevant items outlined in the warrant scope.
Agents typically question those present about suspected drug activities and may threaten charges if cooperation is not immediately offered. Note details.
Any items agents believe may be tied to drug crimes can be seized as evidence or subject to forfeiture. Receipts should be provided listing items taken.
Following searches, prosecutors may file charges quickly or further investigate. Cases may languish for years before resolution.
Engaging counsel at the first sign of a search warrant application or execution is critical to protect rights.
Skilled lawyers can pursue multiple strategies to suppress illegally gathered DEA evidence or penalize misconduct:
If affidavits contained deliberately or recklessly false information, allege Fourth Amendment violations in motions seeking to exclude all evidence from the tainted search.
Informant testimony used to establish probable cause may be fabricated or uncorroborated. Challenge credibility through cross-examination and proof they lied previously.
Object to affidavit assertions without live testimony subject to cross-examination at suppression hearings so claims face scrutiny.
Even valid warrants only allow seizures specifically described. Seek suppression if agents clearly exceeded limitations.
If constitutional rights were knowingly violated, sue the DEA for monetary damages for emotional distress, lost income, and other impacts.
Determined advocatesexplore every option rather than assuming violations must be tolerated. Protect your rights through obstinate legal resistance.
Though sometimes innocuous,DEA raidsoften inflict lasting harm:
Agents may leave behind broken down doors, ransacked belongings, or other damage in aggressive searches for which obtaining compensation is extremely difficult.
Highly publicized raids portray targets as convicted criminals before any charges file, causing community distrust, lost jobs, and social stigma.
Shutting businesses for searches costs money, and mere suspicions and probes can drive customers away permanently. Legal fees and seizure of assets also impose financial burdens.
Having your life upended by a sudden, invasive raid inflicts psychological trauma on targets and families that counseling may be needed to process.
Even when searches yield nothing, agents feel pressure to justify raids. You may face charges over tiny drug residues or fall victim to fabricated evidence.
The harm inflicted deserves commensurate resistance. Fight rather than folding.
Reacting imprudently after search warrants are executed can compound legal problems. Experienced counsel strongly recommend:
As difficult as it may be, avoid emotional outbursts or resisting agents. You only provide justification for added charges.
Note interrogators’ names but refuse to answer questions without your lawyer. Comments will be used against you.
Wait to file complaints about agency misconduct until consulting counsel on proper procedures and immunity issues.
Honesty is essential. Lying to federal agents constitutes a felony. Admit nothing, but do not make false denials.
Exaggerated property damage claims could lead to insurance fraud charges. Account precisely.
Stay strong and trust your legal team to skillfully hold agencies accountable once emotions settle. Keep perspective.
If faced with a DEA raid, take immediate actions to assess options with counsel:
Note Names of Agents
Record identities of all officials involved in the search warrant execution for potential complaints or lawsuits later.
Take photos or video of any property damage or excessive disarray caused during the search that exceeds necessity.
Keep receipts the DEA provides itemizing all evidence and assets seized so legal motions can specifically demand return.
Review Warrant Copy
Agents should provide a copy of the signed warrant and affidavit with PC allegations. Review closely for defects.
Call a Lawyer
Contact warrant challenge lawyers immediately to plan next legal steps. Early action is key.
The aftermath of an invasive raid brings many emotions. But sticking to smart legal strategies consistently produces the best outcomes. Let experienced counsel take charge.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.